- PROJECTION COMPARISON: The $152 million total Gross Gaming Revenue (GGR) in 2018 is only 71% of the projection for 2018 [$213.9 million] given in Rush Street Gaming’s Application for its Rivers Casino gaming license. As discussed below, that shortfall exists despite the Casino having achieved virtually all of its important “wait-untils” that we were told should produce the projected revenue.
- MONTH TO MONTH COMPARISON: For the eleven months of 2018 that correspond with the first eleven months of operation of the Casino in 2017 (February through December), GGR increased 10.5%, with all of the increase coming from Slots/ETG play, the most addictive form of casino gambling, and no increase in table games or poker table gambling.
- ANNUAL COMPARISON: The gaming revenue for the full 52 weeks of 2018 was $152 million, compared to the $129 million GGR generated in the 47 weeks that Rivers Casino operated in 2017. Thus, with 5 extra weeks of operation, GGR was about 18% more than the $129 million of GGR from 2017, which was itself a 30% shortfall from the 2017 projection. More than half of the increase in 2018 GGR over 2017 was in fact due to the 5 extra weeks of operation.
. . Here are charts with those numbers:
Projections – from Rivers Casino Application for gaming license (Item VIII.B.4, at 3)
update: Comparing the first twelve months of operation (Year One) with the second twelve months of operation (Year Two) at Rivers Casino, all growth in gambling revenue continues to be from Slots/ETG:
How will the “Casino Gang” spin the 2018 GGR numbers? I’m betting the owners of the Casino [Rush Street Gaming] and Mohawk Harbor [the Galesi Group], and casino-affiliated businesses, plus elected and appointed officials, who have risked their reputations on casino results, will be merely touting a “significant” increase in gaming revenue over the 2017 results, with corresponding uptick in tax revenue. If you’ve been reading revenue comparisons reported at this website throughout 2018, you already know we are not exactly impressed with the Gaming Revenue situation at Rivers Casino, especially if this is what “stabilization” of operations at Rivers Casino looks like.
A year ago this week, we analyzed the year-end numbers for Rivers Casino in a posting titled “Casino Projections vs. Casino Reality” (Jan. 7, 2018); the image at the head of this paragraph is a detail from a collage called The Rivers Casino Projection Game. It is difficult to feel any more optimistic a year later about the benefits to our community that will flow from Rivers Casino as compared with the risks our leaders took bringing it here. That is especially true when recalling that plans for Mohawk Harbor were well on their way before talk of a casino, and would have brought most of the benefits, more green-space, and maybe a downtown supermarket. Mohawk Harbor without a casino would have meant avoiding the increased risk of problem gambling and addiction, and DWI incidents; along with the dispiriting sight and sound of supine “snowman” leadership, and the disappointing failure to fulfill tax-relief promises, that have come with the Casino.
The downsides seem no less daunting, including the ethically-bankrupt decision to use casino revenue as the source of tax relief (as a wag has put it: Robbing Grandma to pay our property taxes); and the downsizing of Schenectady’s image from Lighting and Hauling the World to home of a mediocre regional casino. The benefits seem scarcely worth the risks taken, especially since Mohawk Harbor and the rebirth of our downtown were already bringing most of those benefits without the downsides.
After reviewing the August 2018 revenue figures, we mused over the predictable Catch-22 our civic “leaders” and Casino Cheerleaders have thrust upon our Community. [There is a slightly edited version at the foot of this posting.*] Efforts to increase gaming revenue, especially gambling dollars from slots, threaten our most vulnerable community members. And, general efforts by Discover Schenectady and local leaders to increase non-gambling dollars spent at Rivers Casino and Mohawk Harbor, will benefit their owners, but bring in lower levels of tax payments (since sales taxes and food/beverages and entertainment and retail are so much lower than gaming revenue taxes).
Rush Street Gaming has a history of over-predicting its gambling revenue, and there is apparently little risk when it does so. Rivers Casino’s gaming business does not need to come even close to its projections to be profitable. And, sadly, even lower than predicted gaming revenue will not be likely to reduce problem gambling, when so many of the gambling dollars are generated by “slotsification“.
Nonetheless, a Civic Booster might ask: Aren’t the final numbers a reason to be optimistic? Isn’t the 17% increase in GGR at yearend 2018 over yearend 2017 truly significant? A Casino Realist might answer: Not, I am afraid, when you realize that there were 5 extra weeks of operation in 2018 than 2017. If 2017 had been a full 52-week year, and monthly average GGR remained the same, we would have expected about $142 million in GGR for 2017. The 2018 result of $152 million, is only 7% higher than the full-year estimate of $142 million GGR.
Indeed, whether the added GGR in 2018 at Rivers Casino was 7%, or 10.5% or 17%, it is difficult to get excited about the increase when we recall all of the in-place features that should have brought many more people and, therefore, more gamblers to Mohawk Harbor. We were told last year to “wait until” many additional amenities were in place. The full-panoply of features at the Mohawk Harbor site that are now in place and should have drawn an ever larger increase in gambling dollars in 2018 include:
- the filling of the 206-unit River House apartment complex
- the holding of Table Game and Poker classes (sponsored by Ellis Medical and MVP)
- the opening of the Marina in November 2017 (with hopes of snagging high-wheeler yacht owners)
- the holding of free weekly summer concerts, drawing thousands, at the Amphitheater
- installation of a giant pylon sign on Erie Boulevard at the Mohawk Harbor entrance
- the opening of the popular Druthers brewery and restaurant
- a broad array of entertainment events
- significant assistance from the Schenectady County tourism and convention center, with its $400,000+ budget and Discover Schenectady website.
- completion of the Mohawk Harbor bike-pedestrian trail
- addition of a CYCLE bike share station at Mohawk Harbor
- and more
Meanwhile, can we expect the early enthusiasm for Rivers Casino gambling to continue in the primary local marketplace? Beyond human nature, which looks for novelty, we have reports of “riots” inside on two occasions, tales of unreported muggings, and increased auto break-ins in nearby neighborhoods, tarnishing its reputation.
Furthermore, Rivers Casino and its experts only predicted, a 10% increase over the 2018 GGR for 2021, which it considered to be a fully stabilized year. Our leaders keep saying “wait until the Casino operations stabilize,” but stabilization at a rather under-whelming plateau, far short of projections, is not cause for celebration.
. . share this post with this short URL: https://tinyurl.com/RiversRevs2018
As more information comes out about 2018 operations and results at Rivers Casino, we will attempt to cover them at this website. It would also be helpful if the media or local government started to look into the effects the Casino might be having on pre-existing businesses in the local entertainment, dining, and leisure marketplace. Also, how have Schenectady residents fared in obtaining and keeping jobs at Rivers Casino?
*/ After reviewing the August 2018 revenue figures, we mused over the Catch-22 our “leaders” and Casino Cheerleaders have thrust upon our Community. This is a slightly edited version:
We are, therefore, in the very Catch-22 situation that any thinking person (especially those not hoping to cash in on the coming of a casino to Schenectady), and any thoughtful politician or leader (especially those realistically looking after the interests of the entire community, weighing pros and cons, and benefits to risks) would have foreseen and avoided when the Casino-In-Schenectady process started in 2014.
Attempting to increase the revenue levels at the Casino will almost certainly increase the social cost, including increasing the incidence of problem gambling, and a Substitution Effect, that drains dollars from existing businesses in the entertainment and hospitality sectors.
Politicians, will suggest tax breaks for the Casino owners and developer, that actually a likely to reduce the amount received by the State, City and County, and increase profits for the Casino Gang [Rush Street Gaming, Galesi Group, associated business “partners”], who do not need to meet the phony projections to reap a profit.
No significant efforts will be made to bring the community the kinds of Problem Gambling Education and Prevention efforts that might ameliorate the social pain that is and will be generated by a casino in our midst, because the State and City do not want to lose the gambling tax revenues and the Casino does not want to prevent the evolution of more and more problem gamblers, who fuel their profits.
Rivers Casino and Mohawk Harbor efforts aimed at Millennials, who prefer drink (esp. craft beer), food, and live entertainment to gambling, will aid the bottom line of the Casino Gang, without a corresponding increase in revenue to the State or municipalities, because sales taxes are so much lower than gambling revenue taxes.
- It is difficult to talk about a Schenectady without a Casino and work toward a transition, when many individuals and families are now counting on the jobs at Rivers Casino, and its failure will cause much social disruption and pain.